Fitch Rates Sierra Timeshare 2021-1 Receivables Funding LLC

(The following statement was released by the rating agency)

Fitch Ratings-New York-17 March 2021:

Fitch Ratings has assigned final ratings and Outlooks to notes issued by Sierra Timeshare 2021-1 Receivables Funding LLC (2021-1). The social and market disruption caused by the coronavirus pandemic and related containment measures have negatively affected the U.S. economy. To account for the potential impact, Fitch incorporated conservative assumptions in deriving the base case cumulative gross default (CGD) proxy. The analysis focused on peak extrapolations of 2007-2009 and 2017-2018 vintages as a starting point. The sensitivity of the ratings to scenarios more severe than currently expected is provided in the Rating Sensitivities section below.

Sierra Timeshare 2021-1 Receivables Funding LLC
----A ; Long Term Rating; New Rating; AAAsf; Rating Outlook Stable
----B ; Long Term Rating; New Rating; Asf; Rating Outlook Stable
----C ; Long Term Rating; New Rating; BBBsf; Rating Outlook Stable
----D ; Long Term Rating; New Rating; BBsf; Rating Outlook Stable

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Borrower Risk — Strong Collateral Quality: Approximately 68.1% of Sierra 2021-1 consists of Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. (WVRI) originated loans; the remaining loans were originated by Wyndham Resort Development Corporation (WRDC). Fitch has determined that, on a like-for-like FICO basis, WRDC's receivables perform better than WVRI's. The weighted average (WA) original FICO score of the pool is 730. Overall, the 2021-1 pool shows a marginal increase in WRDC loans and moderate shift upward in the FICO-band concentrations for the WVRI platform relative to the 2020-2 transaction.

Forward-Looking Approach on CGD Proxy — Weakening CGD Performance: Similar to other timeshare originators, Travel + Leisure Co.'s (T+L [formerly Wyndham Destinations, Inc.]) delinquency and default performance exhibited notable increases in the 2007-2008 vintages, stabilizing in 2009 and thereafter. However, more recent vintages from 2014-2018 have experienced increasing gross defaults versus vintages back to 2009, partially driven by increased paid product exits (PPEs). Fitch's CGD proxy for this pool is 22.40% (lower than 22.50% in 2020-2). Given the current economic environment and increasing gross default trends, Fitch applied a conservative approach to the CGD proxy.

Coronavirus Pressure Continues: Fitch has made assumptions about the spread of the coronavirus and the economic impact of the related containment measures. As a base case scenario, Fitch assumes that the global recession that took hold in 1H20 and subsequent activity bounce in 3Q20 are followed by a slower recovery trajectory from 4Q20 onward with GDP remaining below its 4Q19 level for 18-30 months. To account for this scenario, Fitch's base case proxy focused on prior recessionary vintages of 2007-2009 as well as more recent weaker performing vintages of 2017-2018 to arrive at a 22.40% base case proxy. The CGD proxy accounts for the weaker performance and potential negative impacts from the severe downturn in the tourism and travel industries during the pandemic that are highly correlated with the timeshare sector.

As a downside (sensitivity) scenario provided in the Rating Sensitivity section, Fitch considers a more severe and prolonged period of stress with recovery to pre-crisis GDP levels delayed until 2023 in the U.S. Under the downside case, Fitch also completed a rating sensitivity by doubling the initial base case loss proxy (please refer to Rating Sensitivity section). Under this scenario, the notes could be downgraded by up to three categories.

Structural Analysis — Deal-Over-Deal Lower CE Structure: Initial hard credit enhancement (CE) for the class A, B, C and D notes is 70.20%, 40.70%, 17.00% and 4.50%, respectively. CE is lower for the class A through D notes from 75.50%, 45.25%, 22.75%, and 12.50% respectively, in 2020-2, but remains above pre-pandemic transactions for the class A through C notes. Hard CE comprises overcollateralization, a reserve account and subordination. Soft CE is also provided by excess spread and is 12.0% per year. Loss coverage for all notes is able to support default multiples of 3.50x, 2.50x, 1.75x and 1.25x for 'AAAsf', 'Asf', 'BBBsf' and 'BBsf', respectively. The decline in CE is primarily attributed to a slightly stronger collateral pool than 2020-2, as evidenced by the decline in the base case default proxy.

Originator/Seller/Servicer Operational Review — Quality of Origination/Servicing: T+L has demonstrated sufficient abilities as an originator and servicer of timeshare loans. This is evidenced by the historical delinquency and loss performance of securitized trusts and of the managed portfolio.

Legal Structure Integrity: The legal structure of the transaction should provide that a bankruptcy of T+L and Wyndham Consumer Finance, Inc. (WCF) would not impair the timeliness of payments on the securities.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

Stable to improved asset performance driven by stable delinquencies and defaults would lead to increasing CE levels and consideration for potential upgrades. If CGD is 20% less than the projected proxy, the ratings would be maintained for class A notes at stronger rating multiples. For the class B, C and D notes, the multiples would increase resulting for potential upgrade of one rating category, one notch, and one rating category, respectively.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

Unanticipated increases in the frequency of defaults could produce CGD levels higher than the base case and would likely result in declines of CE and remaining default coverage levels available to the notes. Additionally, unanticipated increases in prepayment activity could also result in a decline in coverage. Decreased default coverage may make certain note ratings susceptible to potential negative rating actions, depending on the extent of the decline in coverage.

Hence, Fitch conducts sensitivity analysis by stressing both a transaction's initial base case CGD and prepayment assumptions and examining the rating implications on all classes of issued notes. The CGD sensitivity stresses the CGD proxy to the level necessary to reduce each rating by one full category, to non-investment grade (BBsf) and to 'CCCsf' based on the break-even loss coverage provided by the CE structure. The prepayment sensitivity includes 1.5x and 2.0x increases to the prepayment assumptions representing moderate and severe stresses, respectively. These analyses are intended to provide an indication of the rating sensitivity of notes to unexpected deterioration of a trust's performance.

Additionally, Fitch conducts increases of 1.5x and 2.0x to the CGD proxy, which represents moderate and severe stresses, respectively. These analyses are intended to provide an indication of the rating sensitivity of notes to unexpected deterioration of a trust's performance. A more prolonged disruption from the pandemic is accounted for in the severe downside stress of 2.0x and could result in downgrades of one to three rating categories.

Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the U.S. and the broader global economy remain under stress, with surging unemployment and pressure on businesses stemming from government social distancing guidelines. Unemployment pressure on the consumer base may result in increases in delinquencies.

For sensitivity purposes, Fitch also assumed a 2.0x increase in delinquency stress. The results indicated no adverse rating impact to the notes.

Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario

International scale credit ratings of Structured Finance transactions have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of seven notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of seven notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAAsf' to 'Dsf'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Fitch was provided with third-party due diligence information from Deloitte & Touche LLP. The third-party due diligence focused on a comparison and re-computation of certain characteristics with respect to 150 sample loans. Fitch considered this information in its analysis, and the findings did not have an impact on the agency's analysis or conclusions.

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.
REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS A description of the transaction's representations, warranties and enforcement mechanisms (RW&Es) that are disclosed in the offering document and which relate to the underlying asset pool is available by clicking the link to the Appendix. The appendix also contains a comparison of these RW&Es to those Fitch considers typical for the asset class as detailed in the Special Report titled 'Representations, Warranties and Enforcement Mechanisms in Global Structured Finance Transactions'.
ESG Considerations Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg.
Contacts:
Primary Rating Analyst
Brian Coffey,
Director
+1 212 908 0399
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
Hearst Tower 300 W. 57th Street
New York, NY 10019

Secondary Rating Analyst
Jordyn Auge,
Senior Analyst
+1 646 582 3428

Surveillance Rating Analyst
Jordyn Auge,
Senior Analyst
+1 646 582 3428
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
Hearst Tower 300 W. 57th Street
New York, NY 10019

Committee Chairperson
Margaret Rowe,
Senior Director
+1 312 368 3167

Media Relations: Sandro Scenga, New York, Tel: +1 212 908 0278, Email: sandro.scenga@thefitchgroup.com

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
Applicable Model
Numbers in parentheses accompanying applicable model(s) contain hyperlinks to criteria providing description of model(s).
Auto Timeshare Model, v1.1.0 (1)

Read More On This Topic
Sierra Timeshare 2021-1 Receivables Funding LLC - Appendix
Additional Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Solicitation Status
Additional Disclosures For Unsolicited Credit Ratings
Endorsement Status
Endorsement Policy

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, THE FOLLOWING HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/RATING-DEFINITIONS-DOCUMENT DETAILS FITCH'S RATING DEFINITIONS FOR EACH RATING SCALE AND RATING CATEGORIES, INCLUDING DEFINITIONS RELATING TO DEFAULT. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN ESMA- OR FCA-REGISTERED FITCH RATINGS COMPANY (OR BRANCH OF SUCH A COMPANY) CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH RATINGS WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2021 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.