SPY412.93+0.07 0.02%
DIA338.48+1.69 0.50%
IXIC13,942.30-53.80 -0.38%

Fitch Rates Ontario (CA) Airport's Revenue Bonds 'A-'; Outlook Negative

· 03/16/2021 17:29
Fitch Rates Ontario (CA) Airport's Revenue Bonds 'A-'; Outlook Negative

(The following statement was released by the rating agency)

Fitch Ratings-New York-16 March 2021:

Fitch Ratings has assigned an 'A-' rating to the Ontario International Airport Authority's (OIAA) approximately $115.1 million senior revenue bonds series 2021ABC. In addition, Fitch has affirmed ONT's $33.4 million outstanding airport revenue bonds at 'A-'. The Rating Outlook is Negative.


RATING RATIONALE

The ratings reflect ONT's position as a secondary O&D airport in the highly competitive Los Angeles air trade region. The airport benefits from steady growth in passenger volumes since the 2008 recession and prior to the pandemic, with cargo operations providing additional diversification. ONT's residual airline use agreement is expected to result in sound debt service coverage ratios (DSCR) and a growing cash position.

Leverage and cost per enplanement (CPE) are expected to rise due to debt issuances in 2021 and 2022, although both metrics should remain manageable. The rating further considers stable performance following the 2016 transfer of ONT to OIAA from Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA).

The Negative Outlook reflects the substantial adverse impact on operating performance with limited recoveries to date, due to the coronavirus pandemic and related containment measures, along with uncertainty around the timing and magnitude of recovery.


KEY RATING DRIVERS

Secondary Airport in Competitive Region - Revenue Risk (Volume): Midrange (revised from Weaker)

ONT acts as a secondary airport in the large and highly competitive Southern California air service market, primarily serving passengers from the Inland Empire region. The airport's traffic profile has shown considerable volatility and declines during the 2008-2009 recession; however, traffic has steadily recovered since 2014 with enplaned passenger levels remaining above two million, which justifies the revision of the assessment from Weaker to Midrange.

The pandemic has adversely impacted passenger traffic activity and complete recovery is likely to take several years. Airline concentration is elevated despite increased air service offerings, with carrier services focused mainly on western region markets, and with Southwest accounting for almost half of total enplanements. Air cargo represents over half of landed weight at ONT, which provides some revenue diversification and has buoyed performance through the pandemic.

Strong Airline Agreement Constrained by Elevated Costs - Revenue Risk (Price): Midrange

The airport operates under a long-term residual AUL agreement expiring in 2024, which provides the basis for strong cost recovery. All primary passenger and cargo airlines are participants to the agreement. Although the airport has the ability to pass costs on to the airlines, increasing CPE above its currently elevated level could put the airport at a competitive disadvantage to competing airports in the region.

Flexible Capital Plan, Majority Debt-Funded - Infrastructure Development & Renewal: Midrange

The comprehensive five-year capital improvement plan (CIP) through fiscal 2026 is estimated to cost $424.1 million, significantly higher than previous capital needs. While a majority of the projects are deemed necessary to maintain and rehabilitate existing facilities and benefit from airlines support, 82% of funding for the CIP comes from the current or future debt issuances, including issuances planned in fiscal 2022 and after fiscal 2026, which could pressure leverage and rates going forward and may require delaying some non-essential projects. This risk is mitigated by the authority's flexibility to re-evaluate capital needs in the future in coordination with airlines.

Conservative Debt Structure - Debt Structure: Stronger

The authority's rated debt profile consists entirely of senior, fixed-rate, and fully amortizing bonds with final maturity for series 2016 in 2026, and series 2021 in 2051. Annual debt service is decreasing from around $11 million through 2026, and flat between $7 million and $8 million thereafter (around $12 million including the expected 2022 issuance). Reserves for the series 2016 bonds are surety-funded at 10% of the original par amount, and are expected to be cash- or surety- funded for the series 2021 bonds. The series 2021 bonds refund the $34 million in bank anticipation notes (BANs) taken as a result of the constraint on additional borrowing prior to final LAWA settlement payoff. By settling all payments owed to LAWA with proceeds from the 2021 issue, the airport may now issue additional debt on the senior lien.

Financial Profile

ONT's past financial performance has been stable with coverage ratios comfortably above covenant levels. Fiscal 2020 DSCR was robust at 3.0x (2.7x when removing the 25% of adjusted debt service added to revenues per the Master Trust Indenture), lifted by higher net pledged revenues. Due to the residual nature of the AUL, Fitch expects DSCR to remain above 1.4x. CPE has historically been elevated for a medium hub and reached $11.12 in fiscal 2020, and is set to remain above the historical average in the medium term as traffic recovers to pre-pandemic levels.

Net debt-to-cash flow available for debt service (CFADS) was negative prior to the issuance of the 2021 series and is expected to rise above 8.0x in fiscal 2021 before declining below 6.0x by fiscal 2024 despite the expected 2022 issuance. Fitch anticipates OIAA's cash and reserves will remain adequate, with liquidity building up over the forecast horizon from current levels of around 200 DCOH.


PEER GROUP

ONT's peers include Burbank, CA (Burbank; A/Negative) and Long Beach, CA (Long Beach; A-/Negative). All three airports are secondary airports located in the Los Angeles air trade area. Compared to ONT, Burbank shares similar enplanement levels over two million, a residual AUL with full cost recovery, and negative rating case leverage, but has significantly lower CPE around $2.00. Long Beach has higher leverage of 3.0x on average compared to ONT and lower coverage, but higher liquidity (over 400 DCOH). Both Burbank and Long Beach have more modest capital improvement plans, with substantially less expected new money issuance.


RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive rating action/upgrade:

--Positive action is unlikely in the near term given the current airport profile;

--However, a revision of the Outlook back to Stable is possible in the next one to two years, if recovery in traffic and revenues is sustained as the pandemic recedes, resulting in normal air traffic patterns and credit metrics in line with indicative guidance.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action/downgrade:

--A return to sustained traffic declines or elevated volatility resulting in reduced enplanements and/or inability to manage costs, which leads to unsustainable CPE levels;

--Borrowings beyond those currently forecast resulting in leverage above 4.0x absent a strong airline cost-recovery agreement.


Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit [https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579].


TRANSACTION SUMMARY

ONT is expected to issue three 2021 series of airport revenue bonds, all senior secured, fixed rate, and fully amortizing parity with similar structural features to the outstanding bonds. The bonds are estimated to be issued in a par amount of $115.1 million. The proceeds of series 2021 will fund the LAWA Repayment of $24.8 million required under the Settlement Agreement, effectively lengthening the duration of this obligation from 2026 (final year of the Settlement Agreement) to 2051, the maturity of the bonds. The rest of the proceeds will be used to retire outstanding subordinated series 2019 note ($34.7 million) and finance the remaining costs of the 2021 Project.

This bond issuance will expedite the completion of the Settlement Payment obligation to LAWA.


CREDIT UPDATE

Fiscal 2020 saw an overall decrease in enplaned passengers of 17.6% from fiscal 2019. Enplanements have decreased 61.3% over the first seven months of fiscal 2021 (July 2020 through January 2021) compared to the prior year. While this drop is substantial, Fitch notes that the airport's traffic has been the least affected by the pandemic among Southern California airports. For CY 2020, ONT experienced a decrease in passengers of 54.7% versus 67.4% for LAX, for example.

Cargo continues to perform well, in line with the pre-pandemic trend and serving to offset recent declines on the passenger side. Total landed weight actually increased 5.3% in fiscal 2020, primarily due to a 13.4% increase in cargo landed weight, thanks to a strong presence of UPS and growing activities from FedEx and Amazon. The airport is expecting to reap significant revenues from a new facility leased to FedEx and future rents, and over 200 acres it plans to lease in the near term. Fitch views these developments positively, as they would diversify the airport's revenue.

The airport was awarded $22.2 million in CARES Act grants. $6.6 million of CARES Act grants were used in fiscal 2020 on M&O expense reimbursement, and ONT intends to use the remaining $15.6 million to reimburse M&O expenses again in fiscal 2021. The authority was allocated through the Airport Coronavirus Response Grant Program (ACRGP) an estimated additional grant funding of $8.8 million from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (CAA). The authority has not decided how to allocate these additional grant funds.

Fiscal 2020 operating revenues, excluding CARES Act funds and other operating grants, increased 3.0% from fiscal 2019, mainly from yoy growth from ground transportation, rental car, and news and gifts concession revenue. With the inclusion of $7.1 million in CARES and other grants, total operating revenue actually increased 11.9% overall. For July through December fiscal 2021, operating revenues without including CARES funds decreased 19.6% compared to the same six-month period in fiscal 2020.

Fiscal 2020 M&O expenses increased 1.9% compared to fiscal 2019. Through the first six months of fiscal 2021, the authority has reduced M&O expenses by 22.7% compared to the same six-month period in fiscal 2020.

ONT's capital plan through fiscal 2026 is significant ($424.1 million) and will require further debt issuance in fiscal 2022 (anticipated $79.4 million) and possibly in fiscal 2026 (anticipated $172.0 million). However, management maintains some flexibility to adjust project schedules and funding needs based on activity and coordination with the airlines. Projects currently being implemented are deemed necessary to maintain and rehabilitate the existing facilities and are proceeding as expected.


FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Fitch Cases

Given the current economic environment due to the pandemic and the unlikeliness of a stable operating environment over the near term, Fitch's Coronavirus Rating Case is also considered the Base Case.

Fitch's coronavirus rating case assumes, relative to fiscal 2019, a 55% enplanement decline in 2021 followed by recoveries reverting the losses to 25%, 15%, and 5% in fiscal 2022, 2023 and 2024, respectively, and a full recovery by fiscal 2025. While non-aeronautical revenues are mostly fluctuating with passenger traffic, airline payments are driven by cost recovery terms under the rate agreements and adjusted by CARES funding for costs.

The case does not include federal relied from the CAA, since those funds have not been budgeted by the airport yet. Results indicate a total Fitch-calculated DSCR profile averaging about 1.8x, exceeding covenant levels, while cost per enplanement peaks above $18 in 2021. Leverage is initially 8.1x, but then migrates downward below 6.0x by fiscal 2024.

Fitch also ran the coronavirus severe downside scenario, which shows a maximum traffic reduction of 65% in fiscal 2021 relative to fiscal 2019, and assumes a prolonged recovery. Additionally, a 10% stress on cargo landed weight, an important revenue driver for ONT, is assumed in fiscal years 2021-2025. Under this scenario, the DSCR and leverage profiles are the same as the rating case given the fully residual AUL. However, CPE peaks at $28 in fiscal 2021 and stays above $15 before decreasing below $11 in fiscal 2025.


REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria.
ESG Considerations Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by the entity. For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg.

Ontario International Airport (CA)
----Ontario International Airport (CA) /Airport Revenues/1 LT; Long Term Rating; Affirmed; A-; Rating Outlook Negative

Contacts:
Primary Rating Analyst
Charly Missirian,
Senior Analyst
+1 646 582 4834
Fitch Ratings, Inc.
Hearst Tower 300 W. 57th Street
New York, NY 10019

Secondary Rating Analyst
Henry Flynn,
Associate Director
+1 646 582 4580

Committee Chairperson
Emma Griffith,
Senior Director
+1 212 908 9124

Media Relations: Sandro Scenga, New York, Tel: +1 212 908 0278, Email: sandro.scenga@thefitchgroup.com

Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
Applicable Model
Numbers in parentheses accompanying applicable model(s) contain hyperlinks to criteria providing description of model(s).
GIG AST Model, v1.2.0 (1)

Additional Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form
Solicitation Status
Additional Disclosures For Unsolicited Credit Ratings
Endorsement Status
Endorsement Policy

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, THE FOLLOWING HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/RATING-DEFINITIONS-DOCUMENT DETAILS FITCH'S RATING DEFINITIONS FOR EACH RATING SCALE AND RATING CATEGORIES, INCLUDING DEFINITIONS RELATING TO DEFAULT. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN ESMA- OR FCA-REGISTERED FITCH RATINGS COMPANY (OR BRANCH OF SUCH A COMPANY) CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH RATINGS WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2021 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.