The Beijing Daily published an article by Yuan Jianqin from the Economic Forecasting Department of the National Information Center of the National Development and Reform Commission, saying that countering internal affairs and looking directly at it is a clear source of the market mechanism. The price mechanism is the “signal light” of the market economy. “Internal rolling” competition seems to make consumers cheaper. In fact, it overdraws product quality, workers' rights, and the momentum for sustainable development of the industry, which ultimately harms the long-term interests of consumers. Remediating internal affairs means correcting distorted price signals, allowing the market to reallocate resources in the direction of quality, efficiency, and innovation, so that “survival of the fittest” can replace “bad money drives out good money.” At the same time, anti-corruption and anti-monopoly efforts are being made in collaboration, and special actions to regulate the administrative enforcement of enterprises involved are also being deepened, all in order to allow business entities to develop with peace of mind. The market economy has never been afraid of competition; it is afraid of disorderly competition. On the surface, the anti-domestic roll corrects competition disorder. At a deeper level, it is a change in development methods, changes in governance concepts, and changes in market expectations. By leading competition from a “depression” of cost to a “highland” of value, so that enterprises dare to invest, dare to innovate, and dare to absorb employment, the Chinese economy will surely be more prosperous and more resilient.

Zhitongcaijing · 2d ago
The Beijing Daily published an article by Yuan Jianqin from the Economic Forecasting Department of the National Information Center of the National Development and Reform Commission, saying that countering internal affairs and looking directly at it is a clear source of the market mechanism. The price mechanism is the “signal light” of the market economy. “Internal rolling” competition seems to make consumers cheaper. In fact, it overdraws product quality, workers' rights, and the momentum for sustainable development of the industry, which ultimately harms the long-term interests of consumers. Remediating internal affairs means correcting distorted price signals, allowing the market to reallocate resources in the direction of quality, efficiency, and innovation, so that “survival of the fittest” can replace “bad money drives out good money.” At the same time, anti-corruption and anti-monopoly efforts are being made in collaboration, and special actions to regulate the administrative enforcement of enterprises involved are also being deepened, all in order to allow business entities to develop with peace of mind. The market economy has never been afraid of competition; it is afraid of disorderly competition. On the surface, the anti-domestic roll corrects competition disorder. At a deeper level, it is a change in development methods, changes in governance concepts, and changes in market expectations. By leading competition from a “depression” of cost to a “highland” of value, so that enterprises dare to invest, dare to innovate, and dare to absorb employment, the Chinese economy will surely be more prosperous and more resilient.