Verisk Analytics (VRSK) drew fresh attention after releasing its 2026 Global Modeled Catastrophe Losses Report, which estimates insurers should brace for about $171b in annual insured catastrophe losses worldwide, the highest figure Verisk has published.
Verisk Analytics has seen mixed momentum around this report, with the share price up 3.11% over the past week and 8.98% over the past 90 days, while the year to date share price return is down 12.07% and the 1 year total shareholder return is down 25.99%. This suggests that recent interest is picking up after a tougher period for longer term holders.
Scan beyond Verisk Analytics and stress test your portfolio against catastrophe risk with our hand picked 74 resilient stocks with low risk scores that may hold up better when insured losses spike.
Verisk Analytics appears to be a solid, profitable data business serving insurers, and the recent share price rebound suggests that investors are paying attention again. The key question is whether that quality is already fully reflected in today’s valuation.
The most followed narrative on Verisk Analytics puts fair value at $76.85, far below the last close of $194.35, which creates a wide gap investors will want to understand.
Verisk Analytics is a regulatory-grade data toll on the US property & casualty insurance industry, monetized through ~83% subscription revenue with ~92% client retention. VRSK's narrow-moat franchise produces FCF with an unusually high degree of predictability, durable enough to justify a 15× exit multiple at a 35% margin of safety. The 2022–2025 portfolio simplification (Energy, Argus, 3E, Marketing Solutions all divested) has produced a cleaner pure-play with structurally higher margins (Adj EBITDA 56.2% in 2025 vs. 53.5% in 2023) and a shrinking share count (~19% reduction since 2019). What the investor is paying for here is a regulatory annuity with an embedded MSD price-and-volume escalator, and walking away from any thesis premised on this becoming a HSD to DD revenue compounder.
Want to see why such a profitable, subscription heavy Verisk Analytics model still lands on a much lower fair value. The narrative leans on rich margins, disciplined portfolio pruning, and a specific exit multiple that does most of the heavy lifting. Curious which cash flow assumptions and growth profile need to hold for that pricing toll booth story to work.
Result: Fair Value of $76.85 (OVERVALUED)
Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what's behind the forecasts.
However, Verisk Analytics still faces narrative risks if catastrophe losses diverge from modelled expectations or if insurance clients push back on pricing for its data services.
Find out about the key risks to this Verisk Analytics narrative.
That user narrative suggests Verisk Analytics is heavily overvalued at $194.35 compared with a fair value of $76.85. Our DCF model points in the opposite direction. It estimates future cash flow value at $233.40, which implies the stock trades at a 16.7% discount instead. Which set of assumptions do you find more realistic?
Look into how the SWS DCF model arrives at its fair value.
Simply Wall St performs a discounted cash flow (DCF) on every stock in the world every day (check out Verisk Analytics for example). We show the entire calculation in full. You can track the result in your watchlist or portfolio and be alerted when this changes, or use our stock screener to discover 50 high quality undervalued stocks. If you save a screener we even alert you when new companies match - so you never miss a potential opportunity.
With such contrasting readings on Verisk Analytics, sentiment is clearly split. Consider reviewing the data for yourself and weighing both sides through the 3 key rewards and 1 important warning sign.
If you stop with Verisk Analytics, you might miss other opportunities. Take a few minutes to scan fresh ideas and pressure test your portfolio from different angles.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com