Nvidia CEO Wong In-hoon warned the Trump administration and other policymakers not to base regulatory policies on sci-fi fears about artificial intelligence. He believes that overreaction at the regulatory level will hinder the implementation and application of artificial intelligence technology and weaken America's competitive advantage. In an interview, Hwang In-hoon slammed the apocalyptic theory of artificial intelligence and indirectly refuted the arguments that other tech company CEOs repeatedly emphasized that AI could cause disastrous risks. “The so-called artificial intelligence will end human civilization is pure nonsense; it is also completely untenable to claim that it will cause half of America's jobs to disappear.” Hwang In-hoon said. He suggested that the real greater risk is to create panic and make enterprises and workers afraid to use artificial intelligence. Huang Renxun called on policy makers to listen to opinions from many parties, not only to solicit the opinions of one or two business executives, and not to set limits on AI technology based on hypothetical scenarios that have not yet occurred. He also vaguely pointed out that some companies seek regulatory rules that are beneficial to themselves under the banner of safety: “Some companies hope to benefit from the government introducing regulations that are biased against them.” When asked if he was worried that the current administration's regulations were overkill, Hwang In-hoon gave an affirmative answer. Anthropic and OpenAI have been lobbying Washington to be highly alert to the potential risks of top AI systems. Many critics believe that this kind of security effort is essentially aimed at consolidating the market monopoly position of the two laboratories.

Nvidia CEO Wong In-hoon warned the Trump administration and other policymakers not to base regulatory policies on sci-fi fears about artificial intelligence. He believes that overreaction at the regulatory level will hinder the implementation and application of artificial intelligence technology and weaken America's competitive advantage. In an interview, Hwang In-hoon slammed the apocalyptic theory of artificial intelligence and indirectly refuted the arguments that other tech company CEOs repeatedly emphasized that AI could cause disastrous risks. “The so-called artificial intelligence will end human civilization is pure nonsense; it is also completely untenable to claim that it will cause half of America's jobs to disappear.” Hwang In-hoon said. He suggested that the real greater risk is to create panic and make enterprises and workers afraid to use artificial intelligence. Huang Renxun called on policy makers to listen to opinions from many parties, not only to solicit the opinions of one or two business executives, and not to set limits on AI technology based on hypothetical scenarios that have not yet occurred. He also vaguely pointed out that some companies seek regulatory rules that are beneficial to themselves under the banner of safety: “Some companies hope to benefit from the government introducing regulations that are biased against them.” When asked if he was worried that the current administration's regulations were overkill, Hwang In-hoon gave an affirmative answer. Anthropic and OpenAI have been lobbying Washington to be highly alert to the potential risks of top AI systems. Many critics believe that this kind of security effort is essentially aimed at consolidating the market monopoly position of the two laboratories.