Since the end of the first quarter, all domestic ETFs were renamed according to the “core element of investment subject+ETF+ manager abbreviation” format, after structural market testing in the second quarter, ETF matrices under some leading institutions have begun to have brand effects and recognition, attracting great attention from capital. However, after the name change, some ETFs still face the problem of similar abbreviations, making it difficult for investors to identify them. In response, industry insiders suggest adding index company names to the front end of the existing structure to form a four-stage naming system of “index company+core elements+ETF+ manager” to help investors distinguish “same name and different quality” products, avoid ignoring differences in underlying preparation due to similar names, and reduce the risk of mismatches.

Since the end of the first quarter, all domestic ETFs were renamed according to the “core element of investment subject+ETF+ manager abbreviation” format, after structural market testing in the second quarter, ETF matrices under some leading institutions have begun to have brand effects and recognition, attracting great attention from capital. However, after the name change, some ETFs still face the problem of similar abbreviations, making it difficult for investors to identify them. In response, industry insiders suggest adding index company names to the front end of the existing structure to form a four-stage naming system of “index company+core elements+ETF+ manager” to help investors distinguish “same name and different quality” products, avoid ignoring differences in underlying preparation due to similar names, and reduce the risk of mismatches.