Every investor in MicroAd, Inc. (TSE:9553) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 49% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
As a result, public companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit JP¥17b market cap following a 10% gain in the stock.
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about MicroAd.
View our latest analysis for MicroAd
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
MicroAd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of MicroAd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Hedge funds don't have many shares in MicroAd. CyberAgent, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 49% of shares outstanding. With 8.0% and 4.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Kentaro Watanabe and Asset Management One Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders. Kentaro Watanabe, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in MicroAd, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own JP¥1.7b worth of the JP¥17b company. This shows at least some alignment, but we usually like to see larger insider holdings. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
With a 32% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over MicroAd. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
It appears to us that public companies own 49% of MicroAd. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with MicroAd (including 2 which shouldn't be ignored) .
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.