Every investor in Keyfield International Berhad (KLSE:KEYFIELD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 36% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
Following a 13% increase in the stock price last week, private companies profited the most, but insiders who own 36% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Keyfield International Berhad.
Check out our latest analysis for Keyfield International Berhad
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Keyfield International Berhad. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Keyfield International Berhad's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Keyfield International Berhad. With a 27% stake, CEO Chit Huei Kee is the largest shareholder. Lavin Group Sdn. Bhd. is the second largest shareholder owning 27% of common stock, and Mohd Bin Ahmad holds about 6.2% of the company stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Mohd Bin Ahmad is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 54% stake.
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Keyfield International Berhad. Insiders have a RM436m stake in this RM1.2b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Keyfield International Berhad. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
It seems that Private Companies own 36%, of the Keyfield International Berhad stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Keyfield International Berhad has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit concerning) we think you should know about.
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.