If you want to know who really controls Méliuz S.A. (BVMF:CASH3), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
Following a 16% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but institutions who own 28% stock also stood to gain from the increase.
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Méliuz.
See our latest analysis for Méliuz
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
Méliuz already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Méliuz, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Méliuz. The company's largest shareholder is BTG Pactual Asset Management SA Distribuidora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários, with ownership of 21%. With 15% and 5.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Israel Salmen and Canary Fund are the second and third largest shareholders. Israel Salmen, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive.
We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Méliuz S.A.. Insiders have a R$183m stake in this R$865m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 45% stake in Méliuz. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
Private equity firms hold a 5.7% stake in Méliuz. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Méliuz you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.