The controversy over the biological composition content of giant beans continues. On June 4, Juzi Biotech revealed the test results of recombinant collagen products. Among them, it was mentioned that each of the four testing institutions used different testing methods, and the final result was that the component content was greater than 0.1%. Meanwhile, the company denied “false advertising.” Huaxi Biotech responds to this: the safety and prosperity of an industry requires the participation of ecological partners such as testing agencies, professionals, and the media, and an environment where whistleblowers are not treating whistleblowers as rumormakers. Instead, the melamine incident was not our lack of technical means to detect this harmful substance, but bad companies took advantage of loopholes in testing standards. Today, we also need to prevent individual companies from combining with a small number of impure scholars to manipulate standard discussions to create standards that are beneficial to a small number of enterprises and bad for the development of the entire industry and society as a whole. It also uses “standard disputes” and “commercial disputes” to cover up an enterprise's basic product safety and value promises.

Zhitongcaijing · 06/06 05:25
The controversy over the biological composition content of giant beans continues. On June 4, Juzi Biotech revealed the test results of recombinant collagen products. Among them, it was mentioned that each of the four testing institutions used different testing methods, and the final result was that the component content was greater than 0.1%. Meanwhile, the company denied “false advertising.” Huaxi Biotech responds to this: the safety and prosperity of an industry requires the participation of ecological partners such as testing agencies, professionals, and media, and an environment where whistleblowers are not treated as rumormakers. The melamine incident was not that we lacked the technical means to detect this harmful substance, but that bad companies took advantage of the loopholes in testing standards. Today, we also need to prevent individual companies from combining with a small number of impure scholars to manipulate standard discussions to create standards that are beneficial to a small number of enterprises and bad for the development of the entire industry and society as a whole. It also uses “standard disputes” and “commercial disputes” to cover up an enterprise's basic product safety and value promises.