To get a sense of who is truly in control of Thomas Cook (India) Limited (NSE:THOMASCOOK), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 65% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Clearly, public companies benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by ₹5.7b last week.
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Thomas Cook (India).
View our latest analysis for Thomas Cook (India)
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Thomas Cook (India). This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Thomas Cook (India)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Thomas Cook (India) is not owned by hedge funds. Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 65% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 2.9% of common stock, and Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited holds about 2.0% of the company stock.
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Thomas Cook (India) Limited. As individuals, the insiders collectively own ₹1.5b worth of the ₹65b company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
It appears to us that public companies own 65% of Thomas Cook (India). This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Thomas Cook (India) you should know about.
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.