November 11 ushered in a key procedural ruling on the intellectual property dispute between Jaguar Land Rover and BYD Ti7. The Dutch court in The Hague officially rejected Jaguar Land Rover's application for preservation of evidence and disagreed with its request to carry out a surprise search of BYD's relevant office materials and obtain internal R&D documents. The court ruled that the core found that this large-scale surprise investigation was not sufficiently necessary. Earlier, Jaguar Land Rover submitted an application in the Netherlands, hoping to unexpectedly obtain a large amount of core materials such as research and development documents and technical data through the courts. Once this type of evidence collection is approved, a large amount of self-developed technical data and trade secrets will be extracted and sealed.

November 11 ushered in a key procedural ruling on the intellectual property dispute between Jaguar Land Rover and BYD Ti7. The Dutch court in The Hague officially rejected Jaguar Land Rover's application for preservation of evidence and disagreed with its request to carry out a surprise search of BYD's relevant office materials and obtain internal R&D documents. The court ruled that the core found that this large-scale surprise investigation was not sufficiently necessary. Earlier, Jaguar Land Rover submitted an application in the Netherlands, hoping to unexpectedly obtain a large amount of core materials such as research and development documents and technical data through the courts. Once this type of evidence collection is approved, a large amount of self-developed technical data and trade secrets will be extracted and sealed.