What New Hope Buyers Were Betting On

New Hope’s year was punctuated by one big move: the decision to buy the remaining stake in Malabar Resources for A$1.3b and fold it into a much larger coal group. For New Hope shareholders, the return from the start of the year was 47.2%, including dividends. If you were weighing a purchase back on 1 January 2026, what needed to be true in your mind for that kind of outcome to feel plausible?

If the move has made New Hope harder to judge, start where the gap is still open and scan 4 high quality undervalued stocks.

The Argument New Hope Investors Were Really Having

The shares cost A$4.03 at the start of the period, which meant anyone looking at New Hope had to pick between two very different futures that both sounded reasonable.

On the optimistic side, the bullish story pointed to a Fair Value of A$5.7, a notional price if export growth and a 5.8% annual revenue rise played out alongside Southeast Asia urbanization and port upgrades.

The cautious view put Fair Value at A$2.8 instead, assuming the same revenue growth but a 4.5x future P/E because ESG pressure and renewable build out could drag coal demand and limit what investors might pay for New Hope.

What The Evidence Did To The New Hope Debate

The agreed A$1.3b purchase of the remaining Malabar stake gave the bullish New Hope story fresh backing, because it pointed to a larger export coal group rather than a shrinking asset base. Reported H2 2026 revenue of A$952.1m and net income of A$106.7m both rose, although net margin slipped to 11.2%. The evidence cut both ways.

The lesson is simple. When a thesis hinges on scale and profitability, track both acquisition size and net margin. For any other miner, check that bigger projects are not arriving alongside steadily thinner profitability.

What New Hope's Run Up 47% Already Prices In

New Hope now trades at A$5.59, with this Narrative’s Fair Value sitting below that level. The gap rests on the idea that a larger three mine group and the Malabar acquisition do not automatically translate into stronger earnings power.

A buyer today is effectively assuming New Hope can turn a bigger coal portfolio into steady cash generation. The selected Narrative asks how that assumption holds up if weaker earnings per share, higher safety incidents and tighter ESG constraints keep pressing on profitability.

"Although New Hope is moving toward a larger three mine portfolio with the Malabar acquisition, the sharp fall in earnings per share to A$0.19 from A$0.50 on roughly flat A$1.77 to A$1.78b revenue raises the risk that integrating Maxwell simply scales a business model already under price and cost pressure, which could limit future earnings growth even if volumes rise."

Not everyone reads the same price the same way. → See the lower figure this Narrative lands on, and how it gets there

Find Your Own Contrarian Opportunity

By the time a rally makes headlines, you are reading about returns someone else has already earned. Why not go straight to the source and look for your own contrarian opportunity? These three companies trade below our estimated value.

• Company 1 - 17% below our estimate - sells multi vendor cloud, security and AI projects as bundled outcome based services.
• Company 2 - 29% below our estimate - builds a parts network bus and truck fleet operators rely on for uptime.
• Company 3 - 34% below our estimate - expands big box and online channels where shoppers bundle electronics, appliances and services.

Those are three of them. See the full list of 12 financially solid companies →

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com