SPY338.65-7.13 -2.06%
DIA276.64-6.70 -2.36%
IXIC11,355.32-192.96 -1.67%

Celsion Corporation Issues Letter To Stockholders

CEO Provides Updates on Phase III OPTIMA Study Data Analysis and ThermoDox® Investigator-Sponsored Studies   LAWRENCEVILLE, N.J., Oct. 12, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Celsion

· 10/12/2020 08:06

CEO Provides Updates on Phase III OPTIMA Study Data Analysis and ThermoDox® Investigator-Sponsored Studies
 

LAWRENCEVILLE, N.J., Oct. 12, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Celsion Corporation (NASDAQ:CLSN), an oncology drug development company, today announced that Michael H. Tardugno, the company's chairman, president and chief executive officer, issued the following letter to stockholders providing an update on the ongoing data analysis from its Phase III OPTIMA Study with ThermoDox® plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients newly diagnosed with primary liver cancer, or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as growing interest among clinical investigators in conducting studies with ThermoDox® as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies.

To My Fellow Stockholders:

In response to the recent inquiries that we are receiving, I'd like to provide you with the following update regarding the OPTIMA Study's ongoing analysis of probable futility findings, and ThermoDox®, generally.

As I have indicated in earlier press announcements and conference calls, since the unblinding of the OPTIMA Study at the second preplanned interim data analysis on July 9, 2020, which was conducted after reaching the prescribed 158 patient deaths in late April 2020, Celsion continues to follow patients for overall survival. Since April 27, 2020, a total of 14 new deaths have been reported, five of which occurred since July. These deaths are reasonably in line with deaths of 3.0 per month, or 0.7 per week, that had been forecasted by our consulting statistician. We now have a total of 174 deaths in the Study from a total patient enrollment of 556. The Study's statistical plan specifies a minimum of 197 deaths for the final data analysis.

At the second interim analysis by the independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC), which covered 80% of the deaths needed for the final analysis, indicated that the OPTIMA Study had narrowly crossed the futility boundary of Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.90 with substantial uncertainty. The reported HR suggested by the Kaplan-Meier analysis was 0.903 with a p-value of 0.524. The DMC advised Celsion of its findings, leaving the decision to stop the study up to the Company.

In our preliminary evaluation of the topline data, Celsion determined that we should continue to follow patients until such time as futility is either confirmed or dispelled. We based this decision on enrollment trends at study sites in China and Vietnam, among other observations, suggesting that data maturity may be at issue. Additionally, despite the Study's first interim analysis appearing to be on track for a successful outcome, we noted a timed-based change in deaths in the ThermoDox® treatment arm suggested a proportionality issue that required further evaluation. Specifically, 16 deaths occurred in five different Asia-Pacific countries between the first and second interim analyses, and 15 of these deaths were in the ThermoDox® treatment arm.

What steps are we taking?

As promised, Celsion has engaged a global biometrics contract research organization, with forensic statistical analysis capability that specializes in data management, statistical consulting, statistical analysis and data sciences, with particular expertise in evaluating unusual data from clinical trials and experience with associated regulatory issues. The primary objective of the CRO's work is to determine the basis and reasoning behind continuing to follow patients for survival, and if there were outside influences that may have impacted the forecast of futility.

Also as promised, and in parallel, the Company has submitted all OPTIMA Study clinical trial data to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and expects to receive a report on the following:

  • A Cox Regression Analysis for single solitary lesions including minimum burn time per tumor volume, evaluating similarities to the hypothesis generated from the NIH paper published in the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, available here, in which the key finding was that increased RFA heating time per tumor volume significantly improved overall survival in patients with single lesion HCC who were treated with RFA plus ThermoDox®, compared with patients treated with RFA alone. The completed HEAT Study subgroup finding upon which the OPTIMA Study design is based was consistent with the Company's own results, which defined the optimized RFA procedure as a 45-minute treatment for tumors with a diameter of 3 centimeters.
  • A site-by-site evaluation for RFA heating time-based anomalies that may have contributed to the treatment arm performance.
  • An image-based evaluation comparing results from the OPTIMA Study to the data from the HEAT Study that led to the RFA heating time hypothesis.

We expect to report findings from these independent statistical analyses before the end of the year, either or both of which will guide our decision to continue to follow patients to the final analysis at 197 or more deaths, a milestone that should be reached sometime in mid-2021.

The DMC's recommendation on July 9, 2020 to consider discontinuation of the OPTIMA Study was beyond disappointing. It was never anticipated, nor was it supported by the science, independent clinical evaluation of the HEAT Study subgroup or prospective preclinical research conducted by Celsion and our consultants to support the OPTIMA Study. We firmly believe, therefore, that Celsion is obligated to undertake this rigorous evaluation of the data while we continue to follow patients.

Investigator-Sponsored Studies with ThermoDox®

I also would like to update you on the multiple requests we are receiving from investigators to include ThermoDox® in their own studies involving several clinical indications. Below are summaries of several investigator-sponsored studies:

  • Oxford University plans to begin enrolling patients in a Phase I pancreatic cancer study with ThermoDox® in combination with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in early 2021. The primary objective of this trial, known as the PanDox Study: Targeted Doxorubicin in Pancreatic Tumors, is to quantify the enhancement in intratumoral doxorubicin concentration when delivered with ThermoDox® and HIFU, versus doxorubicin monotherapy. This study is being undertaken pursuant to promising data in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer, which was published in the International Journal of Hyperthermia in 2018. That preclinical study showed a 23x increase in intratumoral doxorubicin concentration with ThermoDox® + HIFU, compared with a 2x increase in intratumoral doxorubicin concentration with free doxorubicin plus HIFU.

     
  • Utrecht University in the Netherlands continues to enroll patients in a Phase I breast cancer study to determine the safety, tolerability and feasibility of ThermoDox® in combination with Magnetic Resonance Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) hyperthermia and cyclophosphamide therapy for the local treatment of the primary tumor in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). This investigator-sponsored study, which is being funded by the Dutch Cancer Society, the Center for Translational Molecular Medicine (a multi-million dollar public-private partnership in the Netherlands), will be conducted at University Medical Center Utrecht and will enroll up to 12 newly diagnosed mBC patients. Celsion will supply Thermodox® clinical product for the trial.

     
  • As evidence of the ongoing support Celsion enjoys from the NIH, they have organized a clinical project to evaluate ThermoDox® plus the chemotherapy drug mitomycin in bladder cancer. Depending on the NIH timelines, this study may commence as early as 2021.

A Final Comment

Celsion feels strongly that we owe it to patients, physicians and our investors to continue examining the data from the OPTIMA Study, particularly given how surprising the recommendation was from the DMC. While the trial outcome as predicted by the second interim analysis may not change, and as unlikely as it may be, in the event we see substantial clinical benefit from the CRO and NIH analyses, we will carefully review our options with the 14 regulatory agencies under which the OPTIMA Study is being conducted.

In the meantime, we are heartened by multiple requests from investigators to include ThermoDox® in their own studies involving a number of clinical indications. We believe this interest in investigator-sponsored trials reflects support for the potential of ThermoDox® despite the confounding findings from the OPTIMA Study second preplanned interim analysis.

While we await the outcome of additional data analyses from the OPTIMA Study, we continue to enroll patients in the Phase II portion of the OVATION 2 study evaluating GEN-1 for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. We expect patient enrollment in this clinical trial to be completed by the end of the second quarter of 2021.

Thank you for your continued interest in Celsion.

Sincerely,

Michael H. Tardugno

Chairman, President and CEO