ETFs are still a battleground for a few leading “players”. iFind data shows that 55 asset management institutions in the entire market issue ETFs, with a total management scale of 4.3 trillion dollars. As of the first half of the year, the total management scale of 12 public funds exceeding 100 billion dollars reached 3.59 trillion yuan, accounting for as much as 80% of all ETFs. In terms of specific rankings, the Big Five pattern has not changed. Huaxia Fund leads the industry with a management scale of 75.552 billion yuan, and E-Fangda Fund and Huatai Berry ranked 2nd and 3rd. Southern Fund and Harvest Fund followed. Compared to the beginning of the year, there was no change in the list of 12 fund companies above 100 billion dollars, but the seat order was fine-tuned; Guangfa Fund replaced Huabao Fund and ranked 6th; Wells Fargo Fund ranked 7th; Cathay Pacific Fund ranked 8th; Huabao Fund and Bosch Fund ranked 9th and 10th; Huaan Fund and Yinhua Fund still ranked 11th and 12th, with no change in ranking.

ETFs are still a battleground for a few leading “players”. iFind data shows that 55 asset management institutions in the entire market issue ETFs, with a total management scale of 4.3 trillion dollars. As of the first half of the year, the total management scale of 12 public funds exceeding 100 billion dollars reached 3.59 trillion yuan, accounting for as much as 80% of all ETFs. In terms of specific rankings, the Big Five pattern has not changed. Huaxia Fund leads the industry with a management scale of 75.552 billion yuan, and E-Fangda Fund and Huatai Berry ranked 2nd and 3rd. Southern Fund and Harvest Fund followed. Compared to the beginning of the year, there was no change in the list of 12 fund companies above 100 billion dollars, but the seat order was fine-tuned; Guangfa Fund replaced Huabao Fund and ranked 6th; Wells Fargo Fund ranked 7th; Cathay Pacific Fund ranked 8th; Huabao Fund and Bosch Fund ranked 9th and 10th; Huaan Fund and Yinhua Fund still ranked 11th and 12th, with no change in ranking.