SurplusGLOBAL (KOSDAQ:140070) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky

Simply Wall St · 5d ago

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies SurplusGLOBAL, Inc. (KOSDAQ:140070) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

What Is SurplusGLOBAL's Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at December 2024 SurplusGLOBAL had debt of ₩193.2b, up from ₩117.6b in one year. On the flip side, it has ₩65.5b in cash leading to net debt of about ₩127.7b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
KOSDAQ:A140070 Debt to Equity History April 15th 2025

A Look At SurplusGLOBAL's Liabilities

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that SurplusGLOBAL had liabilities of ₩223.9b falling due within a year, and liabilities of ₩35.3b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had ₩65.5b in cash and ₩10.9b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling ₩182.9b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the ₩88.9b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. After all, SurplusGLOBAL would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

See our latest analysis for SurplusGLOBAL

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

Weak interest cover of 1.9 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 6.3 hit our confidence in SurplusGLOBAL like a one-two punch to the gut. The debt burden here is substantial. The good news is that SurplusGLOBAL improved its EBIT by 8.6% over the last twelve months, thus gradually reducing its debt levels relative to its earnings. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since SurplusGLOBAL will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, SurplusGLOBAL burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

Our View

To be frank both SurplusGLOBAL's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But on the bright side, its EBIT growth rate is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Taking into account all the aforementioned factors, it looks like SurplusGLOBAL has too much debt. That sort of riskiness is ok for some, but it certainly doesn't float our boat. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for SurplusGLOBAL (of which 2 are a bit unpleasant!) you should know about.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.