The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies MRT Inc. (TSE:6034) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
We've discovered 2 warning signs about MRT. View them for free.Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at December 2024 MRT had debt of JP¥551.0m, up from JP¥475.0m in one year. But on the other hand it also has JP¥2.61b in cash, leading to a JP¥2.05b net cash position.
According to the last reported balance sheet, MRT had liabilities of JP¥1.27b due within 12 months, and liabilities of JP¥847.0m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had JP¥2.61b in cash and JP¥486.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it can boast JP¥974.0m more liquid assets than total liabilities.
It's good to see that MRT has plenty of liquidity on its balance sheet, suggesting conservative management of liabilities. Because it has plenty of assets, it is unlikely to have trouble with its lenders. Simply put, the fact that MRT has more cash than debt is arguably a good indication that it can manage its debt safely. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since MRT will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.
See our latest analysis for MRT
Over 12 months, MRT made a loss at the EBIT level, and saw its revenue drop to JP¥4.2b, which is a fall of 23%. That makes us nervous, to say the least.
Although MRT had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss over the last twelve months, it generated positive free cash flow of JP¥431m. So although it is loss-making, it doesn't seem to have too much near-term balance sheet risk, keeping in mind the net cash. We'll feel more comfortable with the stock once EBIT is positive, given the lacklustre revenue growth. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for MRT (1 can't be ignored) you should be aware of.
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.