Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Nikon Corporation (TSE:7731) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of December 2024 Nikon had JP¥159.0b of debt, an increase on JP¥136.0b, over one year. However, its balance sheet shows it holds JP¥164.9b in cash, so it actually has JP¥5.96b net cash.
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Nikon had liabilities of JP¥295.7b due within 12 months and liabilities of JP¥183.1b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of JP¥164.9b and JP¥121.9b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by JP¥192.0b.
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Nikon has a market capitalization of JP¥474.8b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt. Despite its noteworthy liabilities, Nikon boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!
Check out our latest analysis for Nikon
The modesty of its debt load may become crucial for Nikon if management cannot prevent a repeat of the 61% cut to EBIT over the last year. When it comes to paying off debt, falling earnings are no more useful than sugary sodas are for your health. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Nikon's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. Nikon may have net cash on the balance sheet, but it is still interesting to look at how well the business converts its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, because that will influence both its need for, and its capacity to manage debt. Over the last three years, Nikon saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
Although Nikon's balance sheet isn't particularly strong, due to the total liabilities, it is clearly positive to see that it has net cash of JP¥5.96b. Despite its cash we think that Nikon seems to struggle to grow its EBIT, so we are wary of the stock. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Nikon is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is potentially serious...
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.