The Securities Daily article points out that the phenomenon of listed companies delaying responses to inquiries and responding negatively to supervision should be eradicated at multiple levels. First, let independent directors play a better role. After the delayed response has occurred, independent directors shall play a supervisory role and urge the company to earnestly carry out its duties of disclosing information in due course. Second, there should be a warning for the act of delaying responses multiple times without justifiable reasons. It is recommended to promptly follow up on other regulatory measures after the listed company has delayed responses for a certain period or number of times. Finally, there must be corresponding penalties for deliberately delaying responses. It is recommended that if a listed company intentionally delays a response, causing losses to investors, the listed company and those responsible should be held liable.

The Securities Daily article points out that the phenomenon of listed companies delaying responses to inquiries and responding negatively to supervision should be eradicated at multiple levels. First, let independent directors play a better role. After the delayed response has occurred, independent directors shall play a supervisory role and urge the company to earnestly carry out its duties of disclosing information in due course. Second, there should be a warning for the act of delaying responses multiple times without justifiable reasons. It is recommended to promptly follow up on other regulatory measures after the listed company has delayed responses for a certain period or number of times. Finally, there must be corresponding penalties for deliberately delaying responses. It is recommended that if a listed company intentionally delays a response, causing losses to investors, the listed company and those responsible should be held liable.